That being said - A group from the 80's and 90's with "classic" records can make a living touring Europe until their 70 years old.
So if you're trying to make hit records that will bring you financial gain you don't have heart? What does that one members sig line say "What kind of chittlins is that"? Forreal!This question will actually separate wallet from heart. Good post.
Money or no money a hit is for its time while a Classic is a unforgetable limb for its genre.
.....ain't no hip hop artist going to be doing this when they're 70!
....not even a "golden era" hip hop act will be touring when they're the age of say...."The Rolling Stones"!
Spittin bars on stage at the age of 70 aint a good look to most folk...but what if you still nice when you turn 70...lol...and even the Rolling Stones look weird on stage wit they old ass...but hey they gettin paid lovely for what they do still. I feel if the hip hop respected its elders more...they would get the same love the Rolling Stones get....not to get to far off topic I hope.
This is ILLMUZIK so lets get it str8, we're talking about hip hop here. What u stated there refers to Rock N Roll.....ain't no hip hop artist going to be doing this when they're 70! Few do it in there late thirty's and into your 40's you had better be behind the scene. A lot of Rock dudes didn't get in the game until they were 30. Hip hop has always been a "young mans" game....especially if you're in front of the mic or the camera. I'm not saying there aren't older hip hop catz in the game. They are plenty....they just produce, engineer, have positions in the labels etc etc. Let's face fact....not even a "golden era" hip hop act will be touring when they're the age of say...."The Rolling Stones"!
"A lot of Rock dudes didn't get in the game until they were 30"[/I]
Name 10 prominent 'rock dudes' who joined their first band or picked up their first axe or drumsticks after 30 years old. I'll wait lol.
I wasn't referring to them starting in music...I was referring to them actually having any kind of success that mattered. More than a few were garage band members along time before they really got on. Meaning they had way more time than the average hip hop group to feel there way around. You got that reality show Bret rock dude right now parading around like he's 20 and he's gotta be late 30's or better.
The few groups that you named touring at a late age in hip hop are too few! PE is not touring on a regular basis...they did it for a minute. Hell on of my good friends is with Griff every weekend in Atlanta so I know for sure he's not out there. The others you named might have a member or two out there doing a little something. It's definitely not on the level that the Rock classics do it. One of the Fat boyz is no longer among the living. Slick recently got himself out of all the trouble he was in.
We can go back an forth but it's for not. There are just not enough doing it to prove your point imo. I don't see Pete and CL ever getting back together to do it. Heavy D is doing a style of Reggae/RnB right now I think. Wu can't even stay together long enough to get a descent tour in. Dougie's out there, Biz is djing. Bottom line there are just too few to count or keep up with....that's all I'm saying!
p.s I caught Shan at the Apache (which only holds a hundred peeps at best....and no it wasn't filled to capacity) a few months back with KRS......Shan was terrible! Trying to do new shit instead of his classics....
I strongly disagree with that statement when it comes to hip hop. As far as it being "unforgettable" it's only that for the ones who lived that era. Not many if any of todays generation listen to 90's hip hop. U remember at one of the recent award shows when todays hip hop gen had to be thoroughly rehearsed just to do a verse of two from the classics?.....Remember the first making the band when they didn't even know Biggies shit and they wanted to be signed to Bad Boy........need I type more?
A lot of the things you guys are saying "read well" and are very "politically" correct when it comes to hip hop. I'll give u that....lol
Yea, but my point is about the "now" like...if I was to produce a track would it be a cash cow or a track that goes down in history.
If I make a classic it represents what I feel in music, how music has touched my life and how it can affect anyone who really pays attention to it. So the benifits from a classic track vs. a HIT are very big in my eyes.
You really have to factor in the state of the industry these days at the same time with a question like this tho, so I can fully see how many advocates of "Classic" over "Hit" are rationalizing their answers. These days especially there are just too many bubblegum commodified albums that become so called "hits"....but I agree with a lot of your rationale at the same time in regards to having a hit before its a classic fasho.Well I think what people have confused is what you put into a classic and what you put into a hit...
You can put your heart into EITHER ONE!! CLASSIC OR NOT.
You really have to factor in the state of the industry these days at the same time with a question like this tho, so I can fully see how many advocates of "Classic" over "Hit" are rationalizing their answers. These days especially there are just too many bubblegum commodified albums that become so called "hits"....but I agree with a lot of your rationale at the same time in regards to having a hit before its a classic fasho.
Another valid point.i don't think it's possible to TRY and make a classic. maybe in a person's head they're making a classic but they don't have control how people 10-20 years from now are going to see their music.
i think what we're getting at is artistic integrity versus making a sure hit song?
tru dat you can really seperate the boys from the men if you read people's answers to this question...Key word: Integrity.
tru dat you can really seperate the boys from the men if you read people's answers to this question...