Kevin A
Differentiated Rebel
ill o.g.
sYgMa, Bruce Lee's style was ment to be formless, to adapt to forms as water would. Not only was Bruce Lee Fast, he was also powerful. Yeah kickboxers throw knee's and elbows, but seriously doubt that they could get close enough to throw it before losing the fight, in turn not being able to throw it at all. I've seen those kickboxers throw kicks and spin all the way around, c'mon, in a serious fight with a master, you'll let your momentum turn your back on a fighter! Bruce had tons of 1 hitter quiters to get you out of there if he didn't want to play with you. This is a passage from one of Bruce Lee's books on movement.
" Skill in movement is very important in the art of fighting. It is heavily relied upon in attack, defense, deception and conversion of energy. It is your proficiency in mobility or footwork that is contingent upon precise distance between you and your opponent. The strategy of footwork is to take advantage of your opponent's footwork with your own. Your attack or defense may be based on the opponent's foot pattern of advancing and backing off."
I really don't think a thai fighter could get in close enough without paying for it.
Can you really imagine that?
Bruce Lee, bout 30 years ahead of his time
You can't win fighting someone that has 30 times your ability.
Lets say for time sake, Bruce didn't die, you really think Bruce would have held to the knowledge that he had in 1976 and not progressed and further?
Bruce lee has changed the way that all of these styles are fought. Not with flashy stuff that wouldn't have a chance in a real match like flying elbow and knee attacks or Jet Li hay makers. But what bruce demonstated on film was real techniques and would stop a apponent head on (slowed down offcourse). I don't think these guys could beat Bruce Lee in his time, or if Bruce was in thier time, Provided he progressed at a the samed rate. You really don't know what that type of progression might have brought next with Bruce.
" Skill in movement is very important in the art of fighting. It is heavily relied upon in attack, defense, deception and conversion of energy. It is your proficiency in mobility or footwork that is contingent upon precise distance between you and your opponent. The strategy of footwork is to take advantage of your opponent's footwork with your own. Your attack or defense may be based on the opponent's foot pattern of advancing and backing off."
I really don't think a thai fighter could get in close enough without paying for it.
Can you really imagine that?
Bruce Lee, bout 30 years ahead of his time
You can't win fighting someone that has 30 times your ability.
Lets say for time sake, Bruce didn't die, you really think Bruce would have held to the knowledge that he had in 1976 and not progressed and further?
Bruce lee has changed the way that all of these styles are fought. Not with flashy stuff that wouldn't have a chance in a real match like flying elbow and knee attacks or Jet Li hay makers. But what bruce demonstated on film was real techniques and would stop a apponent head on (slowed down offcourse). I don't think these guys could beat Bruce Lee in his time, or if Bruce was in thier time, Provided he progressed at a the samed rate. You really don't know what that type of progression might have brought next with Bruce.