I've never claimed innocence or naivete. I'm just saying "give me some credit" lol.
If you initially assumed that I worked for an Inc. 100 Social Networking firm, then I just hoped you would also assume that I would also be smart enough to choose a bigger target
to launch this "Twitter World Domination/Money Making Campaign" than a hip-hop producers message board.
I'm currently partnered up w/ a collective that is in the midst of planning/organizing several very high profile interactive events this year and next year.
My only point in regards to your comments G.O.D, is please don't tell me that you believe I'm going to by-pass Starbucks, Microsoft, Apple, Under Armour etc. etc. and unleash this diabolical plan on Relic and Agent Smith.
Thanks for appreciating the hustle. If G.O.D. appreciates what I do, then I must be going somewhere. Thanks.
Mocking is an effective form of defusing a situation in your favor. Used to know a publicist at a network who did that to protect its hosts. A publicist I know uses it on a consistent basis for her clients if they get negative coverage in press.
Reminds me of the whole Jon Stewart "my show is preceded by sock puppets" argument to make him look "weak" and then he sticks it to the guys.
PR is all about grassroots bullshit these days anyway, and if you're small, Microsoft wouldn't give you the time of day, dude. No disrespect.
What I am saying is: YOU GOTTA START SOMEWHERE. I respect your hustle... now GET THAT PAPER or I'm going to take it from you!!!
Use what others consider are your weaknesses to your advantage.
P.S. I use Twitter for a select group of friends so we can rapidly coordinate a night out. This is a common occurrence.
That's because most people are too pussy to call someone and talk to them anymore. Email, texting, Twittering, Friendfeeding all feeds into our pussy passive-aggressive lifestyle.
I'd rather have lunch with a motherfucker or a face to face meeting (even 60 seconds) to pitch a project. But I understand the opposite too... you have access to more people with these technologies BECAUSE of their passive-aggressive nature.