i hope thats from a movie...... lol thats funny...
as far as nothing being created,
time has a beginning, we agree here, correct?
if time has a beginning, that means that it did not exist beforehand, and everything that begins to exist must have a cause for its existance.
if time has a beginning, i.e., a creation, and (as far as i knwo, i could be wrong) does not in itself consist of any actual, substantial energy, only being the "reverb" if you will- kind of like an effect on a drum track- but not being of the same wave as the drum track- would it then be plauseable that energy could also have a beginning? if the argument is that nothing is created or destroyed, but we have evidence of time beginning and thus having been created, then would this not provide a "loophole" of sorts that would make way for the possibility of energy itslf having a point of origin?
*going back to the big bang- it is only immprobable on its own merit; with the introduction of a trancendant ceator it now becomes very a possible means to the current state f things.