aight peepz I got something hot for y'all. But first I'm gonna get at y'all beats peepz, so sit tight!
@
iLL ThoughT: Ooh my GOSH! That beat is so dope. It really begs for a dope bassline to go along with it. Keep up the great work!
@
frinko: Your beat has some interesting sounds. I would however make the bass monophonic so it doesn't clash and splash all over the place. Maybe even lower it 1 octave since it'll most likely collide with the rappers as well.
But I love the beat anyways.
@
Intenzify:
1. Not my cup of tea at all. Sounds way too harsh and inharmonic. Needs a ton of work to be better.
a. Drop the mid EQ on the leads / brass so the sound doesn't clash with everything else.
b. Simplify the drums man.
2. Now that's more my cup of coffee. Very nice sampled and arranged.
@
Kus:
1. Now that's a beat to study peepz. Perfect harmony, almost perfect mixing. Only thing I would've done was to apply some filter on the bell.
2. Nice upbeat here. Kinda fresh. Nothing to complain about here.
3. Pretty nice. You got pretty much all right here. Only thing you need to learn is to mix properly. Lower the level on the chords with 75% to give the rapper some slack.
@
Lee Beatzz: You need learn proper harmonizing of your parts. The bass clashes with the sample you used. These things is reason enough to put rappers off using your beat. Skip the vocal, or at least avoid time stretching the sound, and pitch down the voice instead. A bit harder, but sounds better. You must also consider make the song less repetitive. You got pretty much no percussion going on except for that stone sound, and that will sound boring specially when you just remove everything else.
@
Usual:
1. Really dope sample you used here. The drums is really crisp, I would decay the kick though to get rid of that fizzling trail at the end of it.
2. No constructive critics needed here since you know what's wrong. Nice beat though.
Now all critics has been dashed out, here's my beats.
Last but not least, I put this in a showcase a few weeks back, didn't get any constructive critics on it. So here it is again: