You do know you can route a Kong pad to NNXT right? So you get all the functionality of any device you want inside Kong. I dont see how Props fell short at all.
Yeah see, I'm with Steez on this one. It's not that I think software has limited abilities compared to hardware. The opposite is true. Software is almost infinite in capability reliant on youy processing power. And now that you can chain computers together and just keep adding more processors to the project, you can have hundreds of track and synths. But like Steez, I keep looking for speed and ease of workflow so I can focus on the creative process and not the tasking involved. And so far the MPC is king for that when it comes to sampling.
I kept looking for that NOTE ON function in another part of the KONG interface because I am so stuck on the MPC's workflow.
The reality is, I can load 4 KONGS and get 64 pads to trigger. And instead of hitting a bank button to switch between like, A,B,C, or D, I can just use my mouse to click the second, third and fourth track of the sequence and get those sounds.
It's just that on the MPC, you can access all that with one click and you have 64 sounds that can all be on a mute group together so making sampled beats feels way faster with an MPC than KONG has felt so far.
In theory...
I can deploy 10 KONGS, have the CV signal activate the mute of the other KONGS on the track mixer using a CV splitter and have 160 pads that are all on one huge mute group. So KONG has way more customizing and potential compared to the MPC, but it is the MPC workflow and ease of loading and playing and accessing samples is what I can't seem to get Reason to beat.