Cold Truth said:
actually, he has said from the very beginning that this was a goal, so him covering for himself doesnt make much sense.
1. sadaam needed to go, period, end of story. the chances of another arising in his place is immaterial; how do you know that? how do you know that the next guy will be the same? what if he isnt? and if he is, at least they elected him in, same as the us and bush. perhaps there were some inconsistancies with our own election; i am willing to bet that every election has been tainted to a degree. politics is a dirty game and always has been.
honestly i think the bush bashing has, at this point, gotten a little to out of hand, to the point where anything he does, good or bad, is villified for the sake of doing so. we could find the wma's tomorrow, we could pull out, every dead soldiers family could recieve 5 million dollars and no taxes forever, and people would still make negatives out of that and we all know it.
bush=kobe bryant if you ask me......
Right, he said that at the beginnin,,,his big, "War on Terror". LOL, come on,,,,
...so if I ran into your house to rob you and then accidently shot you,,,,when I'm at court defendin myself, I would say I was just there to rob you, not kill you.
1. Sadaam, Castro, Chavez, Ghadafi,,,etc,,,,still thinkin scapegoat.
Elections are always tainted and they are obsolete.
Furthermore,(lol, I said furthermore) Fuck Bush, fuck the war, and fuck Crunk Music!!! Jus playin,,lmao....