Your current workflow go-to's

  • beat this! voting starts in...

V.J. Retro

The silent beat assassin
What are your current go-to plugins, hardware or instruments for your production, mixing, and mastering process?


Do you tend to primarily start with this instrument, or that sampler. Or typically this is your go to EQ or Compressor or processor you're chucking on your tracks or your master.


Often out of force of habit and reliability, why did that tool become your go-to?


Images welcomed
If I'm using the Akai MPC X, I would usually use the AIR Flavor Pro, Lo-Fly and other AIR plugins for mixing. When I use either Cubase or FL Studio, I would master my beats using the Ozone 11 Mastering plugin and the Space Replicator.

The Akai plugins are usually a force of habit and the Mastering plugins are a reliability to me.
 

attila

ILLIEN
Battle Points: 101
I have a Roland JU-06A, TB-03, and the original MicroKorg. I don’t use them. Too often , but every now and then I dust them off when I’m looking for a specific sound.
Get the full list, @Coltorki - I used a lot a Roland JV1080 back in the days (then sold, bad decision).
 

Coltorki

Member
Battle Points: 18
Ok but pleased provide US the full list of your gears! @Kane the MOD asked: "Is anyone using any hardware in their workflow? I mean outside of MPC or Maschine, a hardware Synth or something similar?"
Ok! Sorry,Sorry,Sorry!!!
On MPC live I i love opx4 synth
Roland gaia sh101
Turntable with serato (but im looking for a new turntable - Just bought my 1210mk2)
Tb-3 from beringer - not yet used more)
Stylophone
Dreadbox dysphonia
Verselba mv-1 used overall for TR sequencing (sometimes)
Roland jx-03 never used on illbeats
And, Just from a couple of week, i brought and sp404 and studying on It now (but my job Is sterling 15 hours a day in these times)
Ah! I had a Roland aira chord progressor but i miss It around. Going mad to find It out around home
 
Last edited:

attila

ILLIEN
Battle Points: 101
Screenshot 2025-09-21 alle 16.11.18.png

hey @Iron Keys this is antoher kind of mastering chain I use, I think I added something more for the last output - https://www.illmuzik.com/beat-fights/fight/404/ - and I know it doesn't sound so good and I should put meters after the tape plugin.....
 

Iron Keys

ILLIEN MBAPPÉ
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 829
The most important is to ALWAYS boost 80 Hz and cut 2.5k Hz.
The frequencies you boost are very dependent on the key of the song, the frequencies you cut depend on resonances and clashes, a one size fits all approach isn't quite correct. What you boost on one channel you may cut on another to allow one to cut through the mix more clearly. Always boost and cut with intention, a reason. Not just as standard. Do everything with a set goal in mind, otherwise skip a process altogether.
 
View attachment 7430
hey @Iron Keys this is antoher kind of mastering chain I use, I think I added something more for the last output - https://www.illmuzik.com/beat-fights/fight/404/ - and I know it doesn't sound so good and I should put meters after the tape plugin.....
Why isn't the PAZ Analyzer the last plugin on bus 1? On your input channel you have 1 compressor and 2 Limiters and the bitcrusher is after the compression, personally I would have the sequence Dynamic or standard EQ, Distortion and Clipping, then Compression/Limiting. The reason I put Clipping before Limiting/Compression is it means the Limiter/Compressor doesn't have to work so hard, making it more transparent, even when pushing the loudness hard.
 

JECHO

ILLIEN
Battle Points: 70

attila

ILLIEN
Battle Points: 101
Why isn't the PAZ Analyzer the last plugin on bus 1? On your input channel you have 1 compressor and 2 Limiters and the bitcrusher is after the compression, personally I would have the sequence Dynamic or standard EQ, Distortion and Clipping, then Compression/Limiting. The reason I put Clipping before Limiting/Compression is it means the Limiter/Compressor doesn't have to work so hard, making it more transparent, even when pushing the loudness hard.
I said I should put the meters after the tape plugin. I mean, after everything. I just added something when I wasn't looking at the meters, so I have been too lazy to move that.

The bitcrusher? I usually put a spreader in that position. For some reason I can't remember, the bitcrusher ended up there, but I usually avoid placing it in that position because it can accentuate frequencies or transients in ways I don't expect or introduce too much distortion.... In this case, it's set to 24-bit and doesn't cause too many issues.

Regarding the limiter, the image isn't even accurate: in bus 1, there's the mixdown, and in bus 2, there's the parallel compression. The limiter on bus 1 was for control, and then I turned it off since it wasn't working. Then, on the master, after the tape plugin, I put the l1 ultramaximizer. Every time it's different, but lately, it's rare that I use all this stuff. I don't know if you saw the image of the other mix, quite minimal... here it is :) (less than 1/4, @JECHO)


screenshot-2025-09-05-alle-09-10-44-png.7416
 
Last edited:

Kane the MOD

ILLIEN
Battle Points: 29
The frequencies you boost are very dependent on the key of the song, the frequencies you cut depend on resonances and clashes, a one size fits all approach isn't quite correct. What you boost on one channel you may cut on another to allow one to cut through the mix more clearly. Always boost and cut with intention, a reason. Not just as standard. Do everything with a set goal in mind, otherwise skip a process altogether.
My comment was satirical in nature. I am not boosting or cutting any frequencies without a purpose, but thank you anyway.
 
Top