Audiobellum
Beatmaker
I try my best to create music that at least sound unique in the moment but, I've always doubted that people really want to gravitate to anything different. I'm not claiming that my music is the most unique sounding that there is. My instrumentals are original but, they're still grounded in a theory of harmony that has probably existed for hundreds of years. I just notice that doing something that is truly different will insight backlash for a few reason. If music is truly subjective, then doing something different wouldn't necessarily mean doing anything that was better than before as the idea of better presupposes some objectivity. So where do our standards for what constitute good music come from? Well, it seems that it comes from expectations that have been established over time. It doesn't matter how subjective music actually is, people like familiarity. This is why musical trends and common chord progressions exist. In order to do something truly different, one must go against musical trends. In other words, doing something different means doing something counter-intuitive. For example, jazz music consist of a lot of trends that were a deviation from what was previously established. They're also a lot of well established ideas in classical music and jazz music that just would sound awful to most people like polytonality. People will eventually accept change but, slowly. The reason why I'm posting because I'd like to see how people grapple with these ideas, especially the type of people who don't like the sound of mainstream music these days. I'm also going to be posting two very strange sounding instrumentals and I don't know what the reactions will be like. Speaking of instrumentals, I notice that there is a lot of threads in this section promoting music. Is that really okay? I'm not sure if that is against the rules or not. Will be looking forward to responses.